1997 - On the Run

Rating

single starhalf star

RIYL

Straylight Run
Lydia
The Spill Canvas

Tracklist

1. One Track Mind, Four Track Heart
2. Dancing With the Devil
3. Sunset beyond Black Clouds
4. 4 a.m. Conversation
5. January 19th
6. I Will Always Find You
7. Winds of Change
8. Zechariah's Song
9. A Dream of Form in Days of Thought
10. Tennessee Song Pt.2
11. On The Run

Users Rating

Create an account or log in to rate this album

Your Rating

Create an account or log in to rate this album

In the year 1997, Titanic ruled the the box office, the first Harry Potter novel was published, we lost Princess Diana and Biggie Smalls, a sheep was cloned, and the songs on On The Run probably would have seemed fresh and original. But, sadly, it’s 2008 and nearly everything on Nineteen Ninety Seven’s sophomore album seems generic and overwrought.

The Chicago band went through some major lineup changes following the release of their debut, A Better View of the Rising Moon, last year. That change clearly has had a huge effect on the band’s sound, as they’ve toned down the pop-punk sound present on their debut in favor of more mature indie rock. One can’t help but think that this change was a bit unnatural and contrived, as they’ve essentially made their sound more in tune with current trends.

The album begins with “One Track Mind, Four Track Heart,” which is as awful as its terrible pun of a title lets on and sets up the album to be nothing but mediocre. The way vocalists Kevin Thomas and Alida Marroni play opposing roles in a relationship is interesting at first, and does spices things up a bit, but the novelty of it wears off fairly quickly. On the Run is chock full of bland relationship songs that we’ve heard dozens of times over. Everything is over-sentimental, overdone, and often cringe-inducing. Lyrics like, “Why is it so hard to fall in love? / You turn it on / You turn it off / My broken heart just keeps on breaking,” on “Zechariah’s Song” can’t possibly inspire anything but eye rolls.

If nothing else, the album is quite ambitious. The band incorporates a wide variety of instruments and is obviously aiming for a large sound. The production is also top notch, with everything sounding crisp, clear, and huge. None of that, however, winds up mattering because the songs simply aren’t there.

--Cameron Buchholtz

Last updated: 09/29/2009 09:00PM

Comments

andrewking
07/10/2008
08:19AM
First Means, and now this?
This record was sent to me a looong time ago, and while I haven't spent enough time with it to accurately score it, it's a LOT better than this. I got into a lot of these songs.

No quiffs with the review, but I just want to throw in from a (hopefully) credible voice that this album is good.
Composing
07/10/2008
04:04PM
Age: 25
Location
Waterloo, Ontario
i refuse to believe that this album got a 1.5 star rating.
resist sundials
07/19/2008
01:02PM
Age: 21
Location
Wisconsin
wow, there have been some of the worst ratings ever lately. 1.5? are you kidding? did you listen to it?
sir mix-a-lot
07/19/2008
01:10PM
Location
Sacramento, CA
why are you talking about music on a day like this?

I'm not here to make things better; only to observe and pass judgement.

Originally stated by Scott Miller
It's like talking into a mirror!
Chris Conlan
07/19/2008
02:12PM
Age: 27
Location
Dubuque
It's so hot out, no way I'm going to be going outside.