Terminator Salvation

Terminator Salvation

Rating

single starsingle starsingle starhalf star

Users Rating

single starsingle starsingle star
8 ratings

Your Rating

Create an account or log in to rate this movie

Recent Ratings

There's been a lot of internet hype lately about the new Terminator film, thanks in no small part to the juxtaposition of director McG (he of Charlie's Angels fame) and screenwriters John Brancato and Michael Ferris (the duo behind the horrendous Catwoman and much maligned Terminator 3) with trailers that actually made the movie look, well, good. No one was expecting the fourth film in a franchise that has clearly run its course, is missing its signature star and is being handled by a trio of hacks to be anything but crap. But some cool and stylish looking advertising and the promise of a full blown man vs. machines war only discussed and seen for a few moments at a time in the previous films were tantalizing to say the least.

While I'm happy to say that McG has risen above his own shortcomings to deliver the goods visually, unfortunately the screenwriters perform just about as expected. Their story in its barest form is a good one, but as far as character development, interesting dialogue and any sense of pacing these two just don't measure up. Even adding in several uncredited rewrites from the high profile likes of Paul Haggis (Crash, Million Dollar Baby) and Jonah Nolan (Memento, The Dark Knight) wasn't enough to save this script that, as it exists on paper, is simply a mess.

But despite its glaring screenplay flaws, Terminator Salvation nonetheless manages to entertain in other ways. Though Christian Bale's John Connor is woefully underdeveloped, in many ways superfluous and reads his lines like outtakes from his Batman performance, the heavyweight actor still brings a typically convincing and authentic performance. But the real treats are the other two leads; Sam Worthington's Marcus Wright is a scene stealer, a character that should have been the main focus of the film (rumors persist that he was, and that Bale was being courted for the role but turned it down in favor of the iconic John Connor whose part was then beefed up from secondary to lead).  Marcus' arc is the only one that comes close to actually being an arc in terms of development and having a journey,  and Worthington brings just the right mix of bewilderment and bravado to this amnesiac stranger. But an even bigger surprise is youngster Anton Yelchin's turn as a teenaged Kyle Reese, the eventual protagonist of the original Terminator. By all accounts this squeaky voiced weakling should have forever sullied the image of the stoic badass that Michael Biehn brought to life back in 1984, but against all odds Yelchin's very different performance nonetheless works and is darn engaging to boot.

Add in stunning special effects courtesy of ILM and several exciting action sequences - although, to be fair, action sequences that are highly stylistically derivative of recent and better films ranging from Children of Men to Transformers - and you have a film that, while it may not come anywhere close to measuring up to the near perfection of the first two Terminator films, is still a decent addition to the summer movie slate. There's disappointing hints of unnecessary studio interference in the form of the toned down PG-13 rating and several oddly truncated scenes that seem awkwardly edited just to fit the film's running time in under two hours, but even these shortcomings and the aforementioned script deficiences cannot stop Terminator Salvation from being a film that is more good than bad even in spite of itself.

- Jeff Latta

Comments

jeff the baptist
05/22/2009
04:08PM

and let me just say, I'm also dissapointed by the lack of those rad 80s looking blue lasers that everyone was shooting in the future scenes of the first two terminators!

Rick Gebhardt
05/22/2009
05:14PM
Age: 30
Location
Minnesota

I'll probably go see this with the family this weekend sometime, but I'm going to keep my expectations extremely low...

Find me EVERYWHERE:

jeff the baptist
05/24/2009
04:43PM

fascinating article about the huge differences between the finished film and the script everyone signed on to make:

scott.m
05/24/2009
06:22PM

...forget to post the link?

And I'll probably go see this at some point, but I'm not in a huge rush. My expectations are also pretty low.

chinawhite
05/24/2009
06:59PM

I thought it was pretty darn good.

Bells and Whistles
05/24/2009
08:08PM
Location
Edmonton, AB

Pretty lackluster movie on the whole... but yeah the Marcus character was pretty bad-ass

Warrenwheel
05/24/2009
10:01PM
Age: 27
Location
Baltimore, MD

Liked it but kinda felt let down.  While Marcus was kinda badass...I didn't feel the slightest bit emotional about him...ended up thinking it was dumb that the character played by moon bloodgood (what the hell kind of name is that?) kissed him and it was all heroic that he ends up being a lifesaver to the savior...

also, just gotta say the t-800 model 101 scene was extremely lame, and how within seconds of showing the model, the skin gets blown/melted away

I was entertained at least and think it's a good edition to the terminator storyline, just as the other three movies and sarah conner chronicles were

jeff the baptist
05/24/2009
10:26PM

sorry, silly comment forum thing didnt post the link. just go to chud.com and look for "exclusive: what went wrong with terminator salvation". its interesting.

snoopydogg
05/25/2009
02:48PM
Age: 28
Location
California

loved it.  but all you have to do to make me love something is not make me think about how long before the movie is over.. action packed, solid sequences, story was sort of weak but I loved the casting so it made up for it.  the ending was way too predictable too.

Rick Gebhardt
05/26/2009
09:37AM
Age: 30
Location
Minnesota

The action was decent.  Sam Worthington was great.  The environments looked quite post-apocalyptic and believable.  However, the plot, Christian Bale, the rest of the cast, the Arnold terminator, and the ending were all pretty terrible.  It was entertaining enough as a dumb, action flick, but this could have been so much more. 

Find me EVERYWHERE:

M.J.Austin
05/26/2009
11:21AM
Location
Dallas, Texas

I liked this. Yeah, there was some beyond stupid shit, but I can't say that I wasn't entertained. Had very low expectations after the majority of negative reviews from critics, so that may have been a factor. Which is baffling to me, as that insanely overrated Star Trek film was more poorly written than this movie, yet that one oddly had a nut busted over it.

snoopydogg
05/26/2009
11:39AM
Age: 28
Location
California

it's because McG directed it. people just wanna hate on McG and love everything Abrams

jeff the baptist
05/27/2009
11:15AM
M.J.Austin

I liked this. Yeah, there was some beyond stupid shit, but I can't say that I wasn't entertained. Had very low expectations after the majority of negative reviews from critics, so that may have been a factor. Which is baffling to me, as that insanely overrated Star Trek film was more poorly written than this movie, yet that one oddly had a nut busted over it.

well i'd say that while both star trek and this have story flaws, at least star trek had a sense of drama and making you care about the characters and what happens to them, whereas this story (aside from the marcus stuff) just kinda meanders along and doesnt go anywhere or have any stakes that I personally felt.