Burn After Reading

Burn After Reading

Rating

single starsingle starsingle starhalf star

Users Rating

single starsingle starsingle starsingle star
8 ratings

Your Rating

Create an account or log in to rate this movie

Recent Ratings

In a lot of ways, Burn After Reading is a throwback for the brothers Coen, more reminiscent of their 80s and 90s films than more recent works like O’ Brother Where Art Thou, Intolerable Cruelty, The Ladykillers or even No Country for Old Men. The storyline is classic Coens; a complicated, noir-ish caper with multiple plot threads converging and a wry sense of humor full of quotable dialogue. It’s a mixing of genres and moods – sometimes realistic, other times silly, sometimes mockingly thrilling while other times legitimately tense. Like the best of their films, and in the style that has come to define them, Joel and Ethan Coen have taken many well established influences and mashed them all together to create something utterly their own.

While Coen brothers films have always had excellent casting, this is the first film of theirs where the acting really stands out more than anything else. Every single performer in the all-star cast fits their roles to a “T”, bringing them to life in appealing ways. George Clooney hones the “idiot” persona he developed with the siblings in O Brother Where Art Thou and Intolerable Cruelty and raises it to a new level, and Frances McDormand seems to get the most entertaining and diverse roles of her career when she teams up with her husband and brother in law (consider the wildly different parts she took on in Fargo, this film and The Man Who Wasn’t There). Coen newcomers fare just as well; John Malkovich and Tilda Swinton use their well known personas to their greatest potential, and Brad Pitt is a true standout even in this cast of greatness. His dimwitted Chad Feldheimer is a buffoon the likes of which must be seen to be believed. Not only are his manchild mannerisms hilarious, but he brings a vacant stare to the role that is almost indescribable in how accurately he embodies a moron.

But in some ways the all star cast shining so brightly may be a disservice to the film; despite its A-list pedigree, Burn After Reading is not nearly as accessible as the cast makes it seem like it will be. And it’s not destined to be a cult classic, either – the humor is more amusing than laugh out loud funny (to place it in the context of their other work, it’s more like a light hearted Fargo than a Big Lebowski). Audiences looking merely for disposable “popcorn” entertainment may not quite know what to make of the film; a lot of it is more subtle than overtly satisfying. Burn After Reading has a slow build, with an admittedly somewhat dull first half. Audiences willing to accept it will realize that the film needs to be slow at first to create the mounting sense of “oh shit, this isn’t going to end well” as successfully as it does (assisted by a tense and unexpected score from longtime Coen collaborator Carter Burwell), but the fact remains that even at just over 90 minutes the screenplay takes its time getting into the meat of the story (but be patient; the wrap-up of the film is as entertaining as it is unexpected). Even longtime Coen brothers fans might come away slightly disappointed if their expectations are set too high. Like Intolerable Cruelty and The Ladykillers, when compared with their maverick earlier films Burn After Reading ultimately feels a little bit like a “safe” entry in their body of work.

But for mainstream audiences willing to see something that’s a little out there, and for Coen brothers fans that don’t mind if they restrain their over the top tendencies just a little bit, this is a solid film with an unmistakable style, unique sense of humor and brilliant merging of performers with material. Ultimately, it’s a rare achievement that is a shrewd business move that doesn’t sacrifice artistic integrity (something The Ladykillers didn’t succeed at nearly so well). Though it most likely won’t rake in the awards like No Country For Old Men did last year, and it won’t go down as a groundbreaking standout in the filmography of Joel and Ethan Coen, Burn After Reading is nonetheless unquestionably entertaining.

Grade: B+

- Jeff Latta

Comments

daganjatribe
09/12/2008
01:00PM
Location
Austin
saw it last night, unquestionably entertaining indeed, good review

The Daily Galaxy
An elephant that never forgets...to kill!

HammeroftheGods
09/12/2008
04:57PM
Location
Norman OK
Favorite film of the year so far.

sir mix-a-lot
09/12/2008
07:04PM
Location
Sacramento, CA
reading comments and grade, will read review after watching.

I'm not here to make things better; only to observe and pass judgement.

Originally stated by Scott Miller
It's like talking into a mirror!
DecoyOctopus
09/14/2008
11:39AM
Saw it in Friday.
I loved it.
I was entertained, unquestionably at that.
Dave Spak
09/14/2008
12:04PM
Location
Boston, MA
jeff the baptist
And it’s not destined to be a cult classic, either – the humor is more amusing than laugh out loud funny (to place it in the context of their other work, it’s more like a light hearted Fargo than a Big Lebowski).


Good review but I have to disgree with this part. I thought it had 'cult classic' written all over it. In my opinion, it most closely resembled Big Lebowski in the humor and the way the story unraveled. Actually, there were a lot of parallels between the two films. I also found myself bursting into laughter several times throughout the movie. My favorite movie this year for sure.
Chris Conlan
09/14/2008
01:16PM
Age: 27
Location
Dubuque
Saw this movie last night. Man were there some parts in the movie that caught you off guard.
Chris Conlan
09/14/2008
02:14PM
Age: 27
Location
Dubuque
My bad Armand. Deleted your post so now your mind is completely erased from my previous thread.
babarm87
09/14/2008
02:16PM
Location
Los Angeles
what post?

;)
Chris Conlan
09/14/2008
02:35PM
Age: 27
Location
Dubuque
Exactly.
chinawhite
09/14/2008
09:19PM
Really? It was alright but too slow at times. Definitely not worth my nine bucks.
sasalukac
09/16/2008
11:03PM
Location
Toronto
i still don't know what to think of this movie. amusing for sure, but way too far out in left field. i think the final scene reflected the viewer's thoughts quite nicely
Rick Gebhardt
10/02/2008
08:14AM
Age: 30
Location
Minnesota
I don't think this should be compared to Ladykillers or Intolerable Cruelty at all. This is leaps and bounds above them. It's not Lebowski, but I enjoyed it much more than Fargo.

It was really entertaining, which is key, and some of the out of nowhere moments really succeed in grabbing you and break the film out of some of the conventions of this genre mish-mash. Then you have Pitt and Malkovich both laugh out loud hilarious.

I really enjoyed it and thought it was well worth my eight bucks. The ending was great. I absolutely loved it and thought it put a nice end cap on things.

Find me EVERYWHERE:

jeff the baptist
10/03/2008
12:04PM
yeah, i really really liked the ending too.
scott.m
10/03/2008
12:27PM
I only got so see part of this; a sudden friend crisis forced me to leave halfway through. But what I saw was enjoyable.
sir mix-a-lot
10/03/2008
05:54PM
Location
Sacramento, CA
i have paid to see this twice. knowing what's coming actually makes it BETTER, surprisingly.

I'm not here to make things better; only to observe and pass judgement.

Originally stated by Scott Miller
It's like talking into a mirror!
DecoyOctopus
10/06/2008
04:46PM
rmgebhardt
I don't think this should be compared to Ladykillers or Intolerable Cruelty at all. This is leaps and bounds above them. It's not Lebowski, but I enjoyed it much more than Fargo.

It was really entertaining, which is key, and some of the out of nowhere moments really succeed in grabbing you and break the film out of some of the conventions of this genre mish-mash. Then you have Pitt and Malkovich both laugh out loud hilarious.

I really enjoyed it and thought it was well worth my eight bucks. The ending was great. I absolutely loved it and thought it put a nice end cap on things.

Movies are $8 where you live?
What the fuck it costs me $10.25.
:[
Mike Duchnowsky
10/06/2008
04:47PM
Age: 27
Location
West Haven, CT
This movie was so funny. Me and my girlfriend saw it and there were at least four or five parts where we died laughing.

The Cityscape Burns Brighter By The Hour.

mmakara81
10/06/2008
07:48PM
Location
San Francisco, CA
i really liked it until i came out of the theater to find my car was broken into and my work laptop stolen....that kind of took away from it
Rick Gebhardt
10/07/2008
05:53AM
Age: 30
Location
Minnesota
DecoyOctopus
Movies are $8 where you live?
What the fuck it costs me $10.25.
:[

Not only is it $8, it's a freaking classy joint! Right down the road from where I live: Heights Theater.

Find me EVERYWHERE: